I suppose that anything can happen. Perhaps the editors thought that some of his observations and recollections were in poor taste, or perhaps a bit too coarse for our delicate sensibilities. Would that all men heard and remembered some of the unpleasant details more often. It would serve to keep the focus and perspective more sharp.

Michelle Malkin: MARK STEYN, UNSENTIMENTAL AND UNCENSORED

The jihadists have become rather adept at devising tests customized for each group of infidels: Madrid got bombed, and the Spaniards failed their test three days later; the Australian Embassy in Jakarta got bombed, but the Aussies held firm and re-elected John Howard’s government anyway. With Britain, the Islamists will have drawn many useful lessons from the decadence and defeatism on display.

Well worth the read. Mark Steyn is always a good read. His observations may be a poke in the eye for the Brits who hate Americans and Jews. Perhaps that’s why he was censored. Mustn’t aggravate the readership, now, hmm?